"All Abort!" said the Pro-Abortionist

The author of this article is a phenomenal writer in my opinion. His words are so true, aren't they? As I read it aloud to myself and family I realized just how true this article is. The assumption of pro-abortionists is correctly stated, "It is not human, it is only a fetus." He nailed it right on the dot! That is the question that pops up for every argument abortionists present.
When the idea of an unwanted child comes up, or possibly a rape case, what's the answer to that? That's when pro-lifers pull out the "trot out the toddler" tactic and begin asking questions particularly by using the "if you had a two year old...". In any abortion argument, there is always a way to make the opponent think long and hard about their answer without sounding ridiculous and repetitive. The tactic helps the argument along by coming to the same question over and over again, "Is the fetus the same as a human being?" or "What is the unborn?" In most cases, the opponent will not have a logical or reasonable answer.

"It's unfair for an unmarried woman to have to face the embarrassment of pregnancy."

In my opinion, that is a bunch of hooey. First of all, it is her fault for being so irresponsible. If she did not want a child, than she should have thought about messing around as an unmarried woman. If a woman does not want to face the embarrassment of pregnancy, than she should think about whether or not it is worth it to sleep around with a load of different men. If that same woman has a two year old toddler, would it be fair for that toddler to be killed because it is embarrassing for the mother?

"Abortion should be allowed for a woman whose unborn baby is diagnosed as deformed or handicapped."

The only response I could possibly give besides the trot out the toddler tactic, would have to be, "Try explaining that to a family with a disabled child and see if you will come out alive." If I were using the tactic I would begin once again with the two year old. If someone had a two year old child that was handicapped would it be okay for one to kill that child solely because it was too stressful? I would hope the opponents response would be ,"No."

"If abortion is outlawed, more unwanted children will be born, and these children are likely to be abused or neglected. It is better for such children to never be born than to live such a miserable existence."

If the child is unwanted, then the mother has the adoption option. There is no reason to not allow that baby a chance to live; a chance to make their own decisions; a chance to live how they want to. If you abort the baby, you never gave them a chance, instead you killed life before it could mature and develop into someone like you. If you had a two year old and decided you did not want them anymore, would it be okay for you to kill them? If not, than what makes you think that it is okay to abort one?

My beliefs on the abortion are strong, and I will refute any pro-abortionist anyday. There is no reason for the death of a child besides someone being selfish. The woman making the choice had a right to live, so why shouldn't the child?